View Full Version : CellTech Vs Vitargo
BudTheBuilder
02-25-2009, 09:42 AM
Ok so I know everyone does not really like MuscleTech but I seen a mate of mine use celltech and he gained a shit load of size.
So is this just because all the dextrose in it? or what?
And I also had some mates use vitargo and gain a good decent amount.
So for those who have tried 1 or both what did you think?
militantmuscle
02-25-2009, 12:39 PM
CellTech is a creatine product with a delivery transport system, it has a couple of insulin sensitivity ingredients as well...
VITARGO is a patented carbohydrate product that causes massive reloading of glycogen levels due to the passing through the stomach quickly.
I tried both, and I think that you can get the same type of product in Cell-Tech for far cheaper, and the VITARGO is great under special situations, I would just use dextrose for the application of post workout recovery.
NPCKnight
02-25-2009, 12:57 PM
You are comparing completely different objects here. Your best bet would be to use Vitargo with some sort of creatine monohydrate.
Or dextrose with a creatine mono.
Cell Tech is just not even worthy of being in this equation or thought process at all.
BudTheBuilder
02-25-2009, 07:52 PM
I know cell tech is shit, but I was just wondering is the size caused only from the shit load of dextrose? I would not use it as I ama bit sugar sensative.
As for vitargo I wanted to see what others think of it before I fork out money for it.
thanks guys :)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.