Dave and ALRs thoughts on peptides?

[Bencher]

I dont believe I have seen either of these esteemed gentlemens thoughts on the present state of peptides, or what they think or he future of peptides. Maybe I have just missed them, but im curious. Both have years of experience in the pharmacology surrounding our industries, and have seen many fads come and go, and seen some stay.

[Growin24/7]

good ? bencher

[chiropractor]

yea im interested too cause everyones making it sound like its the next big thing lol listened to superhuman radio and sounded pretty legit not sure about results tho

[Dre23]

good ? bencher


Do you have your account set to detect all things ALRI related??!!
:p

[Mr.Dedication]

subbed for responses :)

[Bencher]

Doing my own research on them. Assuming it is like hgh, takes time to see full benefits.

[s2h]

Author did post in one of the peptide threads on here...have to look...

[Bencher]

Author did post in one of the peptide threads on here...have to look...

Thanks S. I'll have to look better.

[Ryan Bracewell]

I think it all depends on what peptide your referring to. Dave has said he believes real HGH is better than any combo of peptide GH boosters, but there are many peptides out there beyond those

[Bencher]

I think it all depends on what peptide your referring to. Dave has said he believes real HGH is better than any combo of peptide GH boosters, but there are many peptides out there beyond those

No doubt the real stuff is better, at least at this point. Wondering about the aspect of safety, cost, legalities.... Like test boosters, obviously the real stuff is better, but is the OTC booster a viable alterative to the real? With the understanding that you wont get the same extreme results.

[BigJD69]

I know guys on this site say that they are having Good Success with the Peptides, personally I am going to wait a little bit longer b4 trying them hopefully there will be more research on them.

[SwoleChamp]

bencher check out the pt141 thread for authors posts

[toxic Avenger]

I'm not Dave or Author status but I use GHRP-6 and -2 pretty regularly. I am 49 and natural hormones are starting to run down. The GHRPs help relieve joint pain, increase my ability to recover and help me sleep better. The effects wear off after about a month. I've been at it for close to 2 years so I have experimented for a while and can defineitely notice some effects. the effects are not dramatic like AAS and not really add to size per say but for an older athlete it makes harder training possible. The younger guys I know that claim positive effects are doing these things a lot higher. I also know one older guy that did a pretty technical protocol under a anti-aging doc with CJC-1295 DAC, GHRP and Ipamorelin. his IGF-1 more than doubled and he felt great.

[Dre23]

No doubt the real stuff is better, at least at this point. Wondering about the aspect of safety, cost, legalities.... Like test boosters, obviously the real stuff is better, but is the OTC booster a viable alterative to the real? With the understanding that you wont get the same extreme results.

That's just the thing B, the real stuff when referring to taking exogenous growth hormone is NOT the body's real stuff!

Peptides actually cause your body to make its own REAL stuff (gh), and it pumps out the same exact stuff as when you were a kid.

It can't get anymore real than that.

I truly wonder how much experience Dave has with peptides that aren't igf or gh...

Dave also stated for a long time that arimidex was just as go as aromasin in combating estrogen. But just b/c dex is what Dave personally used when he competed (probably) and -sin is newer to the scene, I think Dave's opinion was more of a personal use bias as opposed to a factual statement.

That's why I would take whatever Dave has to say about peptides with a grain of salt until either he uses them himself or he uses them in the athletes he preps. I don't just want his, "Oh well my opinion is..."