Results 16 to 30 of 80
Thread: Women and Trenbolone
-
06-25-2009, 10:25 AM #16
-
06-28-2009, 01:46 PM #17
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- ATL
- Posts
- 1,200
- Rep Power
- 24700
-
06-29-2009, 12:41 AM #18
Whilst I agree with your statement, I have also witnessed great results from LOW dose tren in female athletes. It is a harsh compound but only if it is used in high amounts. The ester is also something we need to take into consideration here and the frequency of injections and amount used..
-
06-30-2009, 12:45 AM #19
I used Tren 4 my last prep with no noticeable side effects except 2 say I did catch a mild case of Tren cough, which always made me feel like I was hoarse or on the verge of catching a cold. Outside of that, I never developed any acne, mood swings or paranoia which I'm told usually accompanies use of this drug. BUT, I am just one woman amongst many others who've had really bad experinces. On the other hand let's examine the facts, the dosage I used was soooooooo small by comparison 2 what I've read. I took at best no MORE than 1/2 of a 1/2 a cc every other day. At worse 1/2 a cc at the other end. The idea was 2 give me a dose that would equal 1cc total 4 the whole wk. My wk starting on Sun ending Fri. So I would take it Sun, Mon, Wed, Fri equaling 1cc. They say Tren should be taken everyday, but I read up on it & it has a self life of 2-3 days. Which means that it was still in my system on my off day & by the 3rd day when it was due 2 leave it was time 4 me 2 bring it back 2 level again. I inadvertently, created away in which I could achieve consistency w/o having 2 stick myslf everyday & quite possibly avoid the side effects bc my dose was so small. I am a fan of the less is more school of thought.Life is short, if I can achieve a result with as little harm 2 myself as possible, I'm taking it.
-
06-30-2009, 09:36 AM #20
-
06-30-2009, 11:28 AM #21
-
06-30-2009, 05:10 PM #22
I would like to add, that effective dosing and side effect manageability, is solely dependent on a solid understanding of esters which are used to gauge the frequency of drug administration to ensure that drug levels in the system are stable throughout the course of any cycle.
SS
-
06-30-2009, 06:12 PM #23
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Silence Is Golden, Duct Tape Is Silver.
- Posts
- 16,086
- Rep Power
- 2148204
-
07-01-2009, 08:48 AM #24
Tren Dose
I absolutely agree with what Sistersteele has 2 say about the correct dose being in direct correlation with the users abilty 2 control the side effects. Also keeping the levels stable helps 2 keep the integrity of the cycle. BTW, my dose was 100mg, I apologize 4 not including that in my post ystrdy.
-
07-02-2009, 10:51 PM #25
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Midwest
- Posts
- 3
- Rep Power
- 0
-
07-05-2009, 07:06 PM #26
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Posts
- 72
- Rep Power
- 339
-
07-05-2009, 07:39 PM #27
Something else I want 2 mention about the use of Tren that I noticed when I went back 2 my notes. When I used Tren E(Enanthate) vs Tren A(Acetate), which is the version I used this time around, figuring there was no essential difference, I discovered that I had no Tren cough at all. Tren E, might utilize a different pathway of production of the enzyme prostagladin, which are made up of EFA's(essential fatty acids). Anyway, they are enzymes that act on a variety of cells such as vascular and smoothe muscle cells causing constriction or diiation, on platelets causing aggregation or disaggregation & on spinal neurons causing pain.
With that said, I noticed in my notes that this time I used Tren A & caught a mild dose of the cough. So I'm thinking that Tren A utilizes the other form of production of prostagladin which dictates Bronchial constriction vs Muscle contraction. Which certainly could explain Tren Cough.
-
07-06-2009, 12:10 AM #28
-
07-06-2009, 12:13 AM #29
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Silence Is Golden, Duct Tape Is Silver.
- Posts
- 16,086
- Rep Power
- 2148204
-
07-06-2009, 09:53 AM #30
Bookmarks