Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
11-06-2014, 11:35 AM #1
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
- Location
- "You tell that punk, that I, me Jon Gotti, will sever your mother f'n head off"-Jon Gotti RIP DMX
- Posts
- 8,066
- Rep Power
- 2147880
Can anyone sue these pos companies for underdosing their protein?
POS companies really need to get Btch slapped CMON!!! They are taking our money and buying who knows what with our money and are feeding us b.s. Basically pimpin all over the:
-
11-07-2014, 10:47 AM #2
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Big Jeff's Family Restaurant, 815 Fremont Ave, South Pasadena, CA
- Posts
- 50,065
- Rep Power
- 2149337
This is America. I believe anyone can sue anyone over anything at any time. All you need is a lawyer willing to do the paperwork.
(Googles)
Hmm. Otoh...
Is it easy to file a lawsuit?
No. To bring a lawsuit, someone must be a fault, there must be an injury or some harm caused, and there must be facts to support your side of things. Sometimes, all the facts are not known. A lawyer can help find out these facts, but since gathering facts may cost time and money, not every case can go forward even though a claim may be just. That is especially true in states that have enacted “tort reforms,” since many of those laws create unfair legal obstacles preventing legitimate cases from going forward.
Don’t lawyers have an incentive to file frivolous cases?
No, the opposite is true. People filing lawsuits do not pay hourly fees to lawyers. They pay on a “contingency” basis, which is an important system because it provides injured people with access to an attorney without requiring that they pay fees up front. Only if the case is successful is the attorney paid - from a percentage of what is won, usually 1/3. Therefore, lawyers must be very selective in the cases they take – they cannot afford to take cases they do not believe they can win.
Moreover, judges throw out frivolous cases and can sanction lawyers who bring them. And as explained above, the contingency fee system acts to screen out baseless lawsuits. Researchers have looked into this, as well. For example, the Harvard School of Public Health studied medical malpractices cases and found no evidence of frivolous cases, stating “[p]ortraits of a malpractice system that is stricken with frivolous litigation are overblown.”
More @ https://www.centerjd.org/faqFacebook | Instagram | Twitter | Join Rx Muscle on Facebook!
Contact [email protected] to be interviewed!
-
11-07-2014, 11:20 AM #3
Actually companies are at lawsuit for unethical practice and also misleading consumers and putting the wrong label on the product. Should be against FDA regulation IMO.
Also putting nitrates in products without getting the lisence paid off from Kramer has caused many lawsuits.2013 & 2014 RX Member of the Year
2014 RX Muscle September Member of the Month
Bookmarks