Results 16 to 27 of 27
Thread: Silvio VS Victor
-
03-09-2009, 03:57 AM #16
-
03-09-2009, 09:36 AM #17
Victor is better than Silvio
-
03-09-2009, 06:19 PM #18
-
03-09-2009, 06:23 PM #19
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Posts
- 2,759
- Rep Power
- 0
You must use real comparisions for this, not side by side photos. If Silvio was the same height as everyone else he would be much better.
-
03-09-2009, 06:25 PM #20
-
03-09-2009, 06:27 PM #21
-
03-09-2009, 07:31 PM #22
Dude, really?? Mind elaborating a little bit more... I am having a hard time seeing this 'aesthetic' difference that you describe.
I am not a Vic or Silvio fan by the way, but I think Silvio dominated Vic at the Arnold, I mean, look at the legs and waist and those ridiculous full-round muscle bellies!!
-
03-09-2009, 08:12 PM #23
victor wins.
Victor's physique really flows.
I like silvio and all, but i don't find his physique very impressive.
it just seems like a bunch of body parts, while victor's, in comparison,
seems to me like everything fits together to add to the whole.
-
03-09-2009, 08:30 PM #24
i generally like Silvio, and like that he has 'vacuum' potential, but can't help but be confused by his structure...Victor on the other hand has classic lines and a pretty much unbeatable flow...if those quads can come up to match his torso...it's over...for everyone...
-
03-09-2009, 08:49 PM #25
Silvio's front double bi kills him IMO, to high of lats. Neither guy has calves, but Vic's thickness owns Silvio but Sil's conditioning obviously owns Vic's
-
03-09-2009, 08:54 PM #26
lets see, victor is 250 and silvio is 220, hmmm i wonder who wins..
silvio beats victor on conditioning thats it.
-
03-09-2009, 09:55 PM #27
silvio ruins his appearance because of his posing. he leans back way to much and does not show it off like he should. if he would learn how to actually pose he would place higher.
Bookmarks