Results 31 to 45 of 64
-
03-08-2010, 01:18 PM #31
im pretty sure i have a good defenition of "ripped" but lets put it to test rw0885's defenition of ripped: criss cross striations in the quads, and tris. split bicepts. diamond calves. deep cuts thru the entire hamstring region. stirated seratus, and glutes. and a back to rival ronnie coleman at the 2002 olympia. anyone disagree?
as for gH, i have no clue what it cost back in the day when they had to fish it out of dead bodies...but i do know that present days the shit cost thousands...so again, how is that shit cheap?
-
03-08-2010, 01:29 PM #32
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Posts
- 114
- Rep Power
- 1134
LOL... Everyone has said the same thing yet we have an argument.
This is too much gear for a guy that size, it's just not neccessary.
I would drop the halo, eq, anadrol, masteron, switch to test prop intsead of E, switch to tren ace instead of E.
I will be starting that very cycle myself soon....
-
03-08-2010, 01:31 PM #33
wow, its almost like i just read the exact same thing that me and everyone else has posted! haha, thanks for joining in atlas.
-
03-08-2010, 07:33 PM #34
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 113
- Rep Power
- 421
-
03-08-2010, 07:40 PM #35
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 113
- Rep Power
- 421
the consensus here is that the majority of rx members play the conservative game and shun anyone that does not do like they do. If me and you are standing on stage and i beat you, does it matter how much gear i took to beat you?? NO, it matters that I won. This sport isnt for pussies, you have to do what it takes to achieve the look you want. as for that douchebag that says im "small in his book" bro you can go fuck yourself, stay on the forums and be a big man behind a keyboard, thats your thing i guess.
Again thanks for the outstanding input RX Muscle!!! True experts on here!!
-
03-08-2010, 07:50 PM #36
-
03-08-2010, 08:04 PM #37
-sic- you asked for people to critique your cycle, and thats exactly what everyone has done. until you get some thicker skin and become able to take the critiques that people are saying on here, why dont you refrain from posting. and by the way, if you need to take all that gear to come in at 175, maybe you should concider a different sport. and if you want to make us all eat our words, then post up some pics of yourself to back what you are saying.
-
03-08-2010, 08:33 PM #38
I have pictures in the members picture thread.....
Don't post insults to my wall again, thanks.
You asked for opinions and mine is you obviously think drugs is the key to winning shows. I won my first show last year 210lb on stage at 5ft8 going to be be a light heavy at the Europa super show in 6 weeks (want more conditioning this time and don't want to be in the low end of the heavys)
So yeah fuck you too.....
-
03-08-2010, 09:19 PM #39
I agree with most of what you are writing. But you should take a look at what is possible at that height/weight combination. Daryl Gee was 5'5" and 175 when he won his pro card. At that height, that is a TON of muscle. I think you taller guys understimate what that amount of muscle looks like on a small frame:
-
03-08-2010, 10:01 PM #40
i already agreed with you that there are alot of short guys with great physique, and tons of muscle.
-
03-08-2010, 11:08 PM #41
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 113
- Rep Power
- 421
Me at 13 weeks out 200lbs @ 10% bodyfat running test/eq/abombs
-
03-08-2010, 11:17 PM #42
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 113
- Rep Power
- 421
slow clap...... lets see here im a first time competitor first year in bodybuilding hmmmmmm give me a couple years see if im not in the light heavies, im just getting started bud, you started this e-trash talk to begin with. ill do what it takes to win shows i dont care about $$$ i love this sport and im going to do it as long as im breathing. you could do a bit better than shoot down a novice guy just cause of his supplement selection. like you said its a small part of the equation.
-
03-09-2010, 12:36 AM #43
-
03-09-2010, 06:11 PM #44
-SIC-
I think what everyone means with the amounts you suggested is the "Too much too soon" thought.
Your goal is to compete and sometimes you have to go balls out to get there, I get that, but with some of our members it doesn't come at the expense of health issues that show up down the road. Being older I agree with them. If I was younger I wouldn't care but I would politely consider the advice at the very least.
If your 13 weeks out or whatever the only problems I see with you cycle is using test E over Prop and tren at 500mgs along with Eq 600mgs. You will get some serious sides with that amount specially when using the a-bombs with it. Cut back on both or on one of them. With that being said, for optimal results with EQ it needs to be run at least 15 weeks. Use tren Ace over E so if some sides appear you can deal with it quicker and it's out of your system faster.
Other than that your a big boy and if you have already considered the risk on your choice of cycle go for it and keep a journal. Come back and show us your results and experinces etc. Tell us what you would or wouldn't do differently. Make sure you have all your AI's, PCT's etc...
Nice pic (No Homo) you have a good frame to work with. I know you have a show but if your patient and take the time to invest in your body I'm sure you will develop an outstanding physique.
-
03-09-2010, 07:59 PM #45
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Posts
- 39
- Rep Power
- 0
theres no way ur 10 percent in that pic...look more like 13-15....u look good though, you'll look great once you get shredded. I would cut out the abombs. There's really no reason to run dbol/abombs while your dieting, they're just gonna make you hold water. Ya, you'll stay strong in the gym but you don't need them. As far as your other doses go, i see no problem, if anything run more.
Bookmarks