Rx needs a chemical enhancement radio show!!

**fitbody** · 03-26-2010, 09:01 PM

cool idea

**data** · 03-26-2010, 09:05 PM

Ya I mean Dave never got a lot of publicity off his old drug talk articles anyways

**J2jud** · 03-26-2010, 09:30 PM

Would be interesting.

**Gaoshang Xiongshou** · 03-26-2010, 09:39 PM

Originally Posted by The Big Sexy

Too many legal liabilities. Even with disclaimers it would be a horrible idea. Well, it would be a great ideal in theory... but a horrible idea on paper.

There are just too many scenarios ranging from a Daniel Perrin like situation to something even more retarded - where the blame will be landed squarely on the hosts and promoter.

This.

I do think it is a great concept though.

**nickyjuan** · 03-26-2010, 10:04 PM

Greattt ideaa

**Shariff Abel** · 03-26-2010, 10:05 PM

Just like in the old days the MD Radio show with Dave Palumbo and John Romano !
It was the best of The best .

**Demorak** · 03-26-2010, 10:07 PM

this is a great idea...but I doubt it will happend Dave is an expert in this field but still he is very carefull with the kind of advice he gives out and rightfully so!

**sassy69** · 03-26-2010, 10:12 PM

Originally Posted by Landworth

Talk is talk... I am not familiar with the Daniel Perrin situation, but how can a radio show have any sort of legal issues because of it's subject matter as long as there isn't anything but talk going on? I mean they have radio shows about smoking weed so why not right? Now the sponsors are another issue, however some sponsors must want to be plugged into a show with a high listener rating...

Eric Perrin - http://www.casewatch.org/doj/zhang.shtml

**qbanfreak90** · 03-26-2010, 10:15 PM

that will be the best radio show of all times

**The Big Sexy** · 03-26-2010, 10:26 PM

Originally Posted by Landworth

Talk is talk... I am not familiar with the Daniel Perrin situation, but how can a radio show have any sort of legal issues because of it's subject matter as long as there isn't anything but talk going on? I mean they have radio shows about smoking weed so why not right? Now the sponsors are another issue, however some sponsors must want to be plugged into a show with a high listener rating...

Originally Posted by shredstack

Why would that be the case? The only way I would see a problem is if he directed people to sources etc.... Telling people to take 500mg's of test along with 800mg's of Primo couldn't possibly get them into legal trouble.

It's one thing to have an forum where people freely discuss the use of anabolics... it would be another thing, completely, to have a show, with "experts" (who I am assuming are NOT doctors?) talking about how to use anabolic steroids ... and in effect, practicing medicine and therapy... something you would in our great country need a medical license for.

Now, I'm not going to sit here and break it down for all the Einstein's out there who can't differentiate between the two... but it is a horrible, horrible idea and would end up causing $100's of thousands in legal fees for Rx and most likely criminal sentences for anyone involved with the show.

**Landworth** · 03-26-2010, 10:49 PM

Bottom line is it hasn't been done... If the people at the top of our industry are too scared to create change, then how can we expect to get away from the same old stagnant crap that we are getting now? You can create a show where you are not openly telling people to take this amount of this in order to get these results... You could stick to the facts, and back it up with research provided by legitimate studies. If a book like Anabolics 9th edition can be published it wouldn't be much different than talking about the contents. The show could discuss legal ramifications of using and distributing anabolics, Dave and John know a lot about that. It could discuss books such as "Anabolic Steroids in Sports and Medicine" by Dr. Charles Yesalis... It could include ways to progressively change the current legal status of anabolic steriods, and an explanation of what would have to change in order to do so... I'm just saying that there are a million ways to go about it, not just take this and call me in the morning.

**tiramisu** · 03-26-2010, 10:50 PM

Originally Posted by Gaoshang Xiongshou

This.

I do think it is a great concept though.

It carries exactly the same liability as dave q&a thread. no more, no less.

**The Big Sexy** · 03-26-2010, 10:56 PM

Originally Posted by Landworth

Bottom line is it hasn't been done... If the people at the top of our industry are too scared to create change, then how can we expect to get away from the same old stagnant crap that we are getting now? You can create a show where you are not openly telling people to take this amount of this in order to get these results... You could stick to the facts, and back it up with research provided by legitimate studies. If a book like Anabolics 9th edition can be published it wouldn't be much different than talking about the contents. The show could discuss legal ramifications of using and distributing anabolics, Dave and John know a lot about that. It could discuss books such as "Anabolic Steroids in Sports and Medicine" by Dr. Charles Yesalis... It could include ways to progressively change the current legal status of anabolic steriods, and an explanation of what would have to change in order to do so... I'm just saying that there are a million ways to go about it, not just take this and call me in the morning.

BOoooooorrrring. Talking about the contents of a book, on a radio show? Who the fuck would listen to that? Seriously? What, because it hasn't been done yet, we should make a show about it? Let's make a show about preacher curls... no one has a radio show about that.

And yes, it is extremely different. Anabolics 9th edition explains the drugs, potential side effects, synergy, and counterfeits... what, we are going to take callers on the show "yeah, I am using this... what is the best..."

Eventually, the hosts of the show will mess up and make a suggestion on what to use or how to use. How crappy would the show be if "Oh, well, for legal reasons we can't talk about what you should use."

Even in your "opinion" can be taken as a suggestion in this context...

It is a pandora's box that should not be opened. This is exactly why so many bodybuilders get busted - they are morons and don't understand the laws.

**The Big Sexy** · 03-26-2010, 10:58 PM

Originally Posted by tiramisu

It carries exactly the same liability as dave q&a thread. no more, no less.

More so, when you register on the site you click a user agreement. You don't click a user agreement or agree that information here is for entertainment uses only by listening to the radio show. Even if such a disclaimer is mentioned at the beginning of the show - it doesn't mean the person listened to it.

**tiramisu** · 03-26-2010, 11:07 PM

Originally Posted by The Big Sexy

More so, when you register on the site you click a user agreement. You don't click a user agreement or agree that information here is for entertainment uses only by listening to the radio show. Even if such a disclaimer is mentioned at the beginning of the show - it doesn't mean the person listened to it.

just because i clicked a button doesn't mean I read the agreement.
your logic is specious.