Results 16 to 29 of 29
-
10-03-2010, 08:18 PM #16"If you ever start taking things too seriously, just remember that we are talking monkeys on an organic spaceship flying through the universe." - Joe Rogan
-
10-03-2010, 08:35 PM #17Big BarryGuest
-
10-03-2010, 08:41 PM #18
-
10-03-2010, 08:45 PM #19
90's conditioning was awesome, wtf happened....
-
10-03-2010, 08:49 PM #20Big BarryGuest
-
10-03-2010, 09:38 PM #21
-
10-03-2010, 09:58 PM #22
He was also the only other bodybuilder to get jumped by a clan of ninjas
-
10-03-2010, 10:23 PM #23
-
10-03-2010, 10:27 PM #24
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Miami
- Posts
- 1,157
- Rep Power
- 36078
-
10-03-2010, 10:28 PM #25
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Miami
- Posts
- 1,157
- Rep Power
- 36078
-
10-03-2010, 10:38 PM #26
Question...
For those of you saying that he couldn't be 0% due to visceral fat, don't calipers only measure subcutaneous/skin fold fat? They do not even take interal/visceral fat into account (unlike underwater hydrostatic bodyfat measurement) correct?
Therefore, couldn't someone theoretically come up at 0% w/the calipers as there is no way for visceral/interal fat to be measured with them? It's not like you're taking a skin fold measurement of your fatty liver, or insulating fat along your colon.
So I'm not saying that Flex, or anyone else for that matter ever really actually could be at 0% with calipers, but bringing visceral fat into the argument is not really valid b/c one could theoretically be at 0% w/the calipers, but still be at a true 3-4% OVERALL bodyfat if the visceral amounts were measured with a more accurate protocal.
-
10-04-2010, 12:40 AM #27
These bodybuilders are on drugs...
Use discount code BARRETT15 = 15% off for the best bodybuilding supplements at IronMagLabs.com
-
10-04-2010, 12:41 AM #28
-
10-04-2010, 01:21 AM #29
0% body fat would mean he's an allergy away from death. Calipers don't take into account the level of fat surrounding our organs.
Bookmarks