Results 106 to 110 of 110
Thread: Who considers...
-
03-28-2009, 05:14 PM #106
-
03-28-2009, 05:27 PM #107
Your ignorance is astounding. Watch one of his routines, say his last arnold classic routine. Then record yourself replicating it, and tell me that requires no athletic ability. By your logic, gymnasts are not athletes either. Nor are any athletes who compete in individual sports, because all that takes is practice, not athletic ability; because apparently you are the first to discover that when one trains their body to perform specific movements, that does not require any athletic ability whatsoever. Really makes me wonder why football players and wrestlers practice drills and maneuvers, because there's nothing athletic about that. And again, you've never even been on stage, or gone through all the mandatories or put together a posing routine, yet you feel qualified to say they require no athletic ability. That's like throwing a football back and forth with a friend and deducing from that being an NFL quarterback is easy and doesn't take all that much work because all you're doing is throwing a ball, right?
-
03-28-2009, 05:32 PM #108
-
03-28-2009, 08:40 PM #109
-
03-28-2009, 08:51 PM #110
Actually, I have given examples of individual sports and team sports in this thread, but you obviously got into such a hurry to try and prove me wrong you failed to read each post thoroughly, which makes you a total jackass. Gymansts are very athletic individuals with extreme body control and balance, strength and coordination, but they utilize there body in sport and they express there athleticism through jumping, flipping, balancing, twisting, and running. As a former football player, I can say with complete confidence that the technical skills of an offensive lineman run blocking, and perfroming it full speed on a play, far supercedes any "athleticism" you may think a bodybuilder has.
Bookmarks