Results 1 to 15 of 36
Thread: IGF1 vs HGH
-
07-10-2011, 09:17 AM #1
IGF1 vs HGH
Ok,i have a little time frame of 3 months for a body recomp.Along with test i will run either gh at 4 i.u.s either igf1 at 50 mcg(no money for both)If you were in my place what would you choose?
-
07-10-2011, 09:26 AM #2
it takes me 2 months to see anything from gh, so although i never tried igf1 i would say its prob better for your time frame.
Have you used both before?
-
07-10-2011, 09:38 AM #3
Only igf1 once,but it was during ''cruisin'' 6 weeks,helped me keep my gains and get slghtly leaner
-
07-10-2011, 09:54 AM #4
-
07-10-2011, 09:58 AM #5
-
07-10-2011, 10:06 AM #6
-
07-10-2011, 10:11 AM #7
id be looking closer to the 80-100mcg mark
-
07-10-2011, 10:18 AM #8
-
07-10-2011, 10:28 AM #9
-
07-10-2011, 10:31 AM #10
-
07-10-2011, 04:06 PM #11
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 220
- Rep Power
- 3240
I've been using GH at 2iu per day for just over 2 months with excellent results. My diet is spot on, but it doesn't take that long to see the results of GH, nor does it take a high dose. I tried 4iu, but was getting to much water retention. If you have good GH the results come quick, provided everything else is in order, but they do get better the longer you use it. I would use the GH over IGF-1.
-
07-10-2011, 04:18 PM #12
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 15
- Rep Power
- 0
I have been pondering this question lately to we all know if you ask people everyone will say gh kicks igf1s ass but is this really correct? especially the the des igf seems to be better to. I know when I ran it it made a noticible difference and its very cheap. I sometimes wonder if the price and lore of what the pros take skew are veiw on how good a compound is I mean if ig1 melts fat off and adds muscle how much better can gh really be? I do know gh is proven with use of the top pro bodybuilders but that does not mean it a lot better?
-
07-10-2011, 04:22 PM #13
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 15
- Rep Power
- 0
and mabey when you talking gym rats dosages such as 4ius a day and igf in similar dosages there is not much difference. I dont know would love to hear from someone in the know that isnt just rehashing the same old shit thats passed down.
Last edited by chess315; 07-10-2011 at 04:23 PM.
-
07-10-2011, 04:40 PM #14
gh is better. gh has its own very anabolic effects plus it increases igf1. 2iu of gh will not do much when compared to the effects of say 10-15iu. 10-15iu is where the real quality effects start to dominate over aas. the right combination of other compounds, diet, and training will of course make a difference in its effects. 50mcg of igf1 is a pretty low dose unless your igf1 is already down. if your healthy and on aas, a good diet, and training program your igf1 levels should already be on the higher end.
-
07-10-2011, 04:51 PM #15
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Posts
- 3,181
- Rep Power
- 0
Bookmarks